Daily Archives: February 23, 2019

General

Legalities In An Accident

Published by:

If you are in front of the other party tries to hide the traces of an accident, to move the car, pick up the pieces, try to gently reason with him, and if that fails, look at this attention to the witnesses and with the help of available funds indicate the original location of the harvested material evidence. Very seriously consider the compilation of on-site accidents of all original documents. Of detailed and careful recording of all circumstances of the accident depends on many things. Later compiled on the basis of primary documents – the protocol inspection of the scene, protocols and inspections of technical condition vehicles, the scheme of the accident, the drivers explanations, testimony, the court establishes a link between the actions of the driver and the consequences to which they led. Demand from employees of GAI recorded in the minutes of the inspection scene literally everything that you think may be irrelevant: the place of collision of cars, their relative position after the accident, the road layout and visibility, traffic and signs in place of the accident, their serviceability and visibility, lighting and visibility at the accident site, state road and weather conditions, traces of inhibition, objects lying in the road, the technical condition of vehicles.

All signs, signs, items must be tied to their homes, lighting poles. Note that an employee traffic police, the protocol constitutes the technical condition of the car the guilty party. It is well known not a few cases where one of the drivers proved his innocence so that the other car were not prescribe the manufacturer of rear view mirrors were not working turn indicators, brake lights, was a "bald" tires.

General

Successful Negotiations

Published by:

A little post turned autobiographical, heh, it's not lack)) 1.Kogda I worked for one organization working to sales of oil products, even as a private lawyer, I was shoved solution to the conflict with the old client – so old that he shipped volumes of parole, and documents and pay the price – and then, in retrospect. And in one of the most beautiful days it happened that any discrepancies on the debt and the volume of shipment. A Document sobssno virtually none. How I solved the problem? I wrote a letter. Steve Geppi insists that this is the case. 11 pages. Came to visit.

The table. The sale, assaults, foam at the mouth … not even close to Concord … "Let's hear from our lawyers." On the one hand, I still Green this, on the other – twice my age, red, fat guy with a brazen face and just Pruszcz ambition, they say, you wait, jerk, finished. I've done is simple: to build a logical chain from one fact to another, from argument to argument. The result was a perfectly harmonious system. In this sense this method – _zakonchit_ its logical chain.

If it is closed, it's hard to beat. As a system of judgments Sophists – the principle is the same. I still remember, as they finished: "Do you argue with the Civil Code?". And that red? Ginger just opened his mouth. He did (!) Did not say in opposition, something mumbled, and all. They say he then took a long time. And I … I never even heard of gratitude.