Then came others as report Meadows, the Gaia hypothesis or the message to peoples of Peron, all of 1972.Las United Nations have taken charge of the problem as evidenced by the 1992 Global climate change Convention and its consequent Kyoto Protocol of 1997. Some scientists argue that it should put limits on emissions of carbon dioxide, considered one of the sources more dangerous pollution, although not the only one. Others argue with the Foundation which directly have to eliminate these emissions, so that life in the planet continued. And for that of the indesglosabilidad above pointed, the question arises which substitutes of hydrocarbons, such as biofuels, could put at risk the food security of the sectors more carecientes of the planetary population. The range of solutions-that should be check thanks to the possibilities of the Internet, and that their knowledge largely limited to worlds as the hispanolusoparlante, because the contents circulating are still mostly in language English – oscillates between what estimate that this whole complex problem has technological solutions and those who believe that only a cultural change, can afford to address this crucial issue. Although personally we are more prone to this position, we are those who believe an incorporation critique of existing technologies or to be generated, it is compatible with a cultural change. We have maintained that we can harmonise guidelines as the domestic economy with so-called disruptive technologies, if We make a critical appropriation of them. Confining us to the Argentinean case (and notwithstanding that it is transportable to other geographical contexts), estimate that we can minimize our carbon footprints, or minimize or directly eliminate the emissions of carbon dioxide that each generates in their daily chores, returning to the practices of the home, or home economy with the technological additions compatible with the objective of not polluting and hunt. Such practices – as we have argued repeatedly can be columbradas in the almanacs of the Ministry of agriculture livestock who edited in Argentina between 1925 and 1954 – were gradual or traumatically replaced by artifacts and practices that were part of the american way or life.